Critics Reviews Of The Handmaids Tale
“But it so much more than
that ― a taut thriller, a psychological study, a play on words. It has a
sense of humour about itself, as well as an ambivalence toward even its worst
villains, who aren’t revealed as such until the very end. Best of all, it
holds out the possibility of redemption. After all, the Handmaid is also a
writer. She has written this book. She may have survived.”
|
The Handmaids tale is a mixture
of a “taut thriller, a psychological study or a play on words”. It has “humour”, as they question even the
worst people. It holds the hope of “redemption”. As we are given hope she
survived. -Summary of Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, The New York Times
·
“And so I step up, into the
darkness within; or else the light”(pg.307)
·
“Perhaps he’s an eye”(pg.28)
·
“Nolite te bastardes
carborundorum”
“As a cautionary tale,
Atwood’s novel lacks the direct, chilling plausibility of Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World. It warns against too much: heedless sex,
excessive morality, chemical and nuclear pollution. All of these may be
worthwhile targets, but such a future seems more complicated than dramatic.
But Offred’s narrative is fascinating in a way that transcends tense and
time: the record of an observant soul struggling against a harsh, mysterious
world.”
|
This novel “lacks the direct” of possible quality seeming
reasonable as “Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World”. It comments
on too many events that could possibly happen. And although theses may be
“worthwhile targets”, they seem complex. Offred is an “observant soul
struggling” – Summary of Paul Gray, TIME
·
“Nor does rape cover it”(pg.105)
·
“I’d like you to play a game of Scrabble with me,”(pg.148)
·
“I could become an unwoman”(pg.146)
“Offred’s monotonous manner of
expression just drones and drones.”
-Robert Linkous, San
Francisco Review of Books
|
Offred’s dull manners
“monotonous” of “expression” makes it less interesting.-Summary of Robert
Linkous, San Francisco Review of Books
·
“I never liked her”(pg.36”)
·
“I don’t sit, but take my
place,”(pg.89)
·
“I go back, along the dimmed
hall”(pg.153)
"In the Gileadean patriarchy, a woman is
denied the right to possess or to have control over her own body. Her body is
segmented and her value is determined on the basis of her reproductive
capability. In The Handmaid's Tale, Atwood suggests that the society of today
where choices are too many may lead to a totalitarian future that prohibits
choice." -Quote from
"Ecofeminist Vision: A Study of Margaret Atwood's Surfacing and The
Handmaid's Tale" by K. Reshmi
|
Critics views
of “The Handmaid’s Tale"
The male
dominant society “patriarchy” a women is given no possession or “control over
her own body”. They are judge on the
“reproductive capability”. She states how Atwood society suggest to much choice
can damage our future” – summary of "Ecofeminist Vision: A Study of Margaret
Atwood's Surfacing and The Handmaid's Tale" by K. Reshmi
·
“Hell no,” (pg.254)
·
“Give me children or else I die” (pg.71)
·
“we were a society dying, said Aunt Lydia, of too
much choice” (pg.35)
"Indeed,
the desire of the Gilead regime to remove name is as strong as the desire to
remove faces. Just as the rules of Gilead try to eliminate mirrors, the
reflection of faces, so they attempt to erase names." Quote by Jessie
Givner about anonymity in Gilead
|
The need
to “remove names” is equal to having to “remove faces”. To link to the society
removing “mirrors, the refection of faces” so they can remove names. – Summary
of Jessie Givner about anonymity in Gilead
·
“Offred isn’t my name, I have another name”(pg.94)
·
“I am Ofglen”(pg.295)
·
“Moira”(though out the novel)
"Strictly
controlled access to leisure reinforces the Handmaid's enslavement."
& "They have no choice regarding the treatment of their bodies; no
permission to select the individuals with whom they pass time; [they have] no
control over their lives." & "Every step, every mouthful of
food, every move is observed, reported, circumvented or approved." -Quotes
from "Study of Female Leisure spaces in Dystopian Novels" by
Margaret Daniels and Heather Bowen
|
They do
not get a choice on the “treatment of their bodies” or “over their lives”. They
are monitored “observed, reported, circumvented or approved”- Summary of "Study of Female Leisure spaces in
Dystopian Novels" by Margaret Daniels and Heather Bowen
·
“ too big” “too dark and shimmering, their mouths
to red (pg. 123)
·
“Nor does rape cover it; nothing is going on here
that I haven’t signed up for”(pg.105)
·
We are two-legged wombs”(pg.146)
Comments
Post a Comment